Legal tech
From a legal problem to a useful product.
Develop tools around a real legal need and the people who will use them. Bring legal reasoning, product decisions and implementation into the same conversation.
Discuss an assignmentWhen this helps
An idea may still need a clear problem definition, or an existing product may need a focused addition. The useful starting point is what the user needs to achieve and what a good result looks like.
How we work
I define legal requirements and expected behaviour, design document logic and workflows, and build or code the agreed tool or prototype. I can also work alongside your AI engineers, backend developers and frontend team. These contributions can be separate assignments or parts of a wider project.
Typical work
- Problem definition, requirements and product scope
- User journeys, prototypes and agreed product development
- Feedback-led refinement and handover preparation
What you receive
- A defined problem, scope and acceptance criteria
- A prototype or working product within the agreed scope
- Documentation and an agreed handover or next-step plan
The documents and outputs are agreed for each assignment.
A few useful answers
Can you help turn a legal tech idea into a product?
Yes. I can help define the problem, legal requirements and user workflow, then work on document logic, a prototype and the development or coding of the agreed tool.
Do you build tools yourself as well as work with developers?
Yes. My work includes building and coding tools directly, as well as collaborating with AI engineers, backend developers and frontend teams on a wider product.
Can we start with a focused prototype?
Yes. We can define a focused prototype around the part of the problem you want to explore first. The initial conversation helps separate what the product must do from additions that can be considered later.
Can you design document automation and legal decision logic?
Yes. I can work with document production, legal requirements and the logic behind automated outputs. This includes making legal conditions and contextual distinctions explicit enough to be implemented and tested.
Can you join an existing product team for a particular part of the work?
Yes. You can engage me for a defined contribution, such as legal requirements, document logic, workflow feedback, coding or quality assurance of the legal output.
Can you review the product’s legal output during development?
Yes. I can compare automated output with the work of a professional lawyer, identify issues in interpretation and context, and review the result again after changes. That feedback can inform both the product logic and the user workflow.
Related services
Workflow analysis & improvement
Understand how legal work moves between people, information and decisions. Improve the process around the work, from intake to review and handover.
Explore this serviceAutomation opportunities
Identify where automation could reduce repetitive legal work and where human judgement remains important. Build a clear basis for deciding what is worth pursuing.
Explore this serviceQuality assurance of legal output
QA focused on what your legal tools produce: documents, clauses and legal conclusions. Examine the output against agreed requirements and relevant scenarios.
Explore this serviceUneek
What are you working on?
Tell us about your situation, your objective and the timing. We will start by defining the right scope.